in touch subscription is one of the services provided by in touch magazine. In touch magazine subscription that take place online increase at a rapid race.

Keeping you informed on In Touch Weekly
 

Reviews (6-10)

1 out of 5: Great if it arrives...on time or EVER

Reviewer: Bobbi J Shapiro (SW United States)

I subscribed to IN TOUCH shortly after it appeared on store shelves. Not only have at least five issues not ever even shown up in my mailbox since then, but IF they do, it is a week AFTER I've seen the magazine on the rack in stores. Terrible subscription service.
 

1 out of 5: Lightweight "Touch"

Reviewer: E. A Solinas "la_solinas" (Hanover, MD USA)

Want the leering celebrity gossip and trend-following of "Us" and "People," but don't want to spend so much time following all those long words? Then "In Touch" is your kind of magazine. Vapid, vacuous and obsessed with the gloss of celebrity, this is instantly forgettable ridiculous tabloid fluff. "In Touch" is essentially a cheap, glossy tabloid magazine. Cover stories are usually the latest salacious love-life/pregnancy/break-up/marriage rumours ("Jennifer Dumps Her Lover!") or fluff stories about how celebrities lost weight, their clothes, their underwear (recommendations for nudie thongs?), how they decorated their homes, and updates on the thousands of reality-show celebrities du jour.

Ironically, despite the wealth of false -- and often silly -- rumours that "In Touch" produces, they have an entire section devoted to pronouncing rumours "false" or "true." Occasionally one of their fluff pieces is interesting, like the brief article on "Lord of the Rings" star Dominic Monoghan and his buggy pets (a mantis and a black widow). But only a handful of articles stand out -- the rest melt together into a sloppy sea of stale rumours.

It's hard to find many magazines more vapid than "In Touch." Aside from the ones for the under-five crowd, that is. It's heavy on pictures and lame captions, light on text, and very heavy on flash. Not to mention obsessed with people and things who are primarily famous for being famous -- Paris Hilton and Demi Moore most prominently.

"In Touch" is strictly a pleasure for those preoccupied by celebrity news, even if that news is garbage in more than one way. Instantly forgettable and light as a feather.

 

1 out of 5: Poor subscription delivery

Reviewer: A magazine reader

Basically this is pure gossip reading. I like the magazine for this purpose; however THIS subscription delivery service is for the birds! I get a magazine, on average, every two or three weeks. When I do finally receive it, it is so outdated that the news is old and the "tv" programs to watch are already over....by several days! The days I receive it also vary, there is no consistency whatsoever - very unreliable and you'd be better served by going to the store and buying it there.
 

5 out of 5: get more than you paid for!

Reviewer: Connie Hopkins (Bristol, Va)

I started buying this magazine the first day it hit the shelf at our Wal-Mart. I haven't missed an issue. This magazine gives you more info than if you knew the stars personally and were up close and personal with their lives. I feel like the other mags dish it out, but sometimes I wonder if some of there stories are just that- STORIES! It seems like they spread it on pretty thick at times just to sell a cover. I don't get that with IN TOUCH. I have a salon, and my clients are anxious to find out what is going on this week with their favourite stars. It doesn't bother me in the least to sit down on a Friday or Saturday night, when the family is winding down, and read this book cover to cover, knowing that my clients are just as much movie buffs as I am, and they will want to know a titbit of information on their favourites. Thanks IN TOUCH, for adding an end of the week incentive for those of us who very rarely get a Saturday off. Your magazine gives me something to look forward to!


1 out of 5: Subscription service very poor

Reviewer: "asugar" (Sonoma, CA United States)

While I enjoy In Touch, a low-rent cross between US Weekly and Hello!, this subscription service is very poor. My magazine arrives one week out of three and usually two weeks after it has been on the newsstands. Save yourself some hassle and skip this subscription.