|
Reviews
(1-5)
5 out of 5 :
Nice quick read glossy
Reviewer:
Dorrie Wheeler
(Virginia Beach, Va United States)
In Touch is a weekly glossy magazines that retails at
newsstands for $1.99. It is very similar to Star and Us
Weekly. They offer fodder on the Hollywood flavour of the
moment, so expect lots of stories about Julia Roberts,
Britney Spears, Brad Pitt, Jenifer Aniston, J.Lo and the
usual suspects. It is very worth the newsstand price. They
rarely, if ever have human interest stories, most of the
stories are all about celebrities, style, make-up, or
fashion. They also have contests some times. A lot of times
I notice they run the same stories and pictures as Us Weekly
so if I had to choose between In Touch and Us Weekly 1 year
subscription is less I would choose Us because it still
seems like they get more exclusive stories that In Touch.
Also, some of the news they run sometimes is weeks old, I
often think they end up filling space close to print time.
It's an okay magazine an worth the cover price.
5 out of 5 : In Touch with Celebs
Reviewer:
E. Rey "flannelpants"
(TX USA)
Yeah, In Touch magazine is basically fluff when compared to
world events, but I like their kind of fluff. This class of
magazine is celebrity driven without being what I would
classify a tabloid (i.e. Star or The National Inquirer). In
comparison, In Touch magazine most closely relates to US
Weekly and People. Of these three magazines, In Touch has
the best quality and quantity of photographs. In Touch's
article's aren't as good as US Weekly's, but with a much
lower cover price it's worth picking up one when in line at
the grocery store. On the other hand, if you are looking to
subscribe to a weekly magazine, US Weekly is a better bet
because their usual subscription price is $.1.00 per issue
versus their $3.50 cover price per issue. Meanwhile, In
Touch does not give much of a price break for subscribers.
Their subscription price is $.1.49 per issue versus their
$1.99 cover price per issue.
2 out of 5 :
You will never know when you're going to
receive it
Reviewer:A.
chen "Ana"
(San Jose, CA USA)
I have subscribed to "In Touch" since September last year
and it's time to renew, but I'm not going to....because this
magazine is never arrived on time (at least 5 of them just
failed to arrive), I don't know whether i should wait for it
or call customer service. I would go to the store and buy it
instead because the magazine itself is very entertaining.
1 out of 5 :
What a Nightmare of a Subscription
Reviewer:
Rommel C. Santor
(Irvine, CA)
I was pleasantly surprised reading many of the reviews on
Amazon. Well, let me rephrase. I was pleased that I am not
the only one with disgust for the company. I started getting
it about 7 weeks ago and the address was incorrect from the
start. I requested an address change every week and it never
happened until I wrote a strongly worded angry email to them
to which they said it would change in about 6 weeks! On top
of that I always received the magazines after I see them in
the store. An on top of that I have not received two issues
in the last three weeks!!! What a horror this company is. So
much, in fact, that I just cancelled the subscription. I'm
subscribing to Us Weekly. Hopefully I'll have better luck
there.
5
out of 5 :
Great magazine but extremely disappointed
with company
Reviewer:
AshleyBear "Ashley!!!!!"
(Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada)
I have been buying In Touch since the very first issue and i
haven’t missed any issues since. i noticed the subscription
information in the magazine and it ticked me off to the
extreme. You'd think that by subscribing to the magazine
they would offer some sort of deal for subscribing but in
this case its the exact opposite. I live in Thunder Bay,
Ontario Canada and in order to subscribe to the magazine it
would cost me 187.65 Canadian (139.00 American). But if I
continue to buy it in the store it will only cost me 178.88
Canadian. What kind of company treats its customers this
way??? I’m definitely not going to be buying In Touch
anymore until we Canadians get some sort of deal as well.
Its rather unfortunate since In Touch is such an
entertaining magazine.
|